<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So much for having a 64-bit OS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://youfailed.us/2009/11/so-much-for-have-a-64-bit-os/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://youfailed.us/2009/11/so-much-for-have-a-64-bit-os/</link>
	<description>Today is the yesterday that we will regret tomorrow.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Aug 2010 23:28:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim d</title>
		<link>http://youfailed.us/2009/11/so-much-for-have-a-64-bit-os/comment-page-1/#comment-469</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 17:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://youfailed.us/?p=190#comment-469</guid>
		<description>You should be thankful, the 32-bit apps will utilize less RAM. I think an interesting test would be to take an open source project, compile as 32-bit and 64-bit executable, and then benchmark the two.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should be thankful, the 32-bit apps will utilize less RAM. I think an interesting test would be to take an open source project, compile as 32-bit and 64-bit executable, and then benchmark the two.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
